<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><!-- generator="wordpress/2.0.3.1" -->
<rss version="2.0" 
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/">
<channel>
	<title>תגובות על: Introduction to Buddhism - Chapter 3: What the Buddha Taught</title>
	<link>http://www.federman.org/blog/2006/32</link>
	<description>תן לנו כוח לשנות, סבלנות בשביל מה שאי אפשר לשנות, וחוכמה להבדיל ביניהם</description>
	<pubDate>Tue, 06 Jan 2009 07:07:16 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.0.3.1</generator>
	<language>he</language>

	<item>
		<title>מאת: אסף פדרמן</title>
		<link>http://www.federman.org/blog/2006/32#comment-86</link>
		<pubDate>Tue, 29 Aug 2006 21:36:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.federman.org/blog/2006/32#comment-86</guid>
					<description>Hi oren, 
Thanks. I agree Kalupahana is good fun. 
and although his views about buddhism are not noncontroversial, I believe they represent a genuine buddhist voice.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div dir="rtl"><p>Hi oren,<br />
Thanks. I agree Kalupahana is good fun.<br />
and although his views about buddhism are not noncontroversial, I believe they represent a genuine buddhist voice.
</p>
</div>]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>מאת: Oren Blass</title>
		<link>http://www.federman.org/blog/2006/32#comment-83</link>
		<pubDate>Sat, 26 Aug 2006 14:08:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.federman.org/blog/2006/32#comment-83</guid>
					<description>oops,

Just wanted to thank you for the reference to Kalupahana's text.
He is more a philosopher of psychology than a psychologists and he argues that Budhism as a form of a-transscendent or anti transcendental empiricism.
well put argumentation, but can not be critically evaluated by a person that does not know the texts like me. however if he is right i find Budhism even more compelling.
I enjoyed your last four posts and learned from them a lot, especially the fourth one. Thanks for adding the references.
best,
Oren</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div dir="rtl"><p>oops,</p>
<p>Just wanted to thank you for the reference to Kalupahana&#8217;s text.<br />
He is more a philosopher of psychology than a psychologists and he argues that Budhism as a form of a-transscendent or anti transcendental empiricism.<br />
well put argumentation, but can not be critically evaluated by a person that does not know the texts like me. however if he is right i find Budhism even more compelling.<br />
I enjoyed your last four posts and learned from them a lot, especially the fourth one. Thanks for adding the references.<br />
best,<br />
Oren
</p>
</div>]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>מאת: Oren Blass</title>
		<link>http://www.federman.org/blog/2006/32#comment-82</link>
		<pubDate>Sat, 26 Aug 2006 13:59:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.federman.org/blog/2006/32#comment-82</guid>
					<description>Kalupahana</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div dir="rtl"><p>Kalupahana
</p>
</div>]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>מאת: גלות רוחנית : spiritual exile &#187; Introduction to Buddhism</title>
		<link>http://www.federman.org/blog/2006/32#comment-81</link>
		<pubDate>Sat, 26 Aug 2006 11:43:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.federman.org/blog/2006/32#comment-81</guid>
					<description>[...] A Brief introduction to Buddhism (this post) Liberation and the Self  What the Buddha taught: The Four Truths  Sects and Texts: The Context of the Abhidhamma Reference lists are at the end of each chapter [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div dir="rtl"><p>[&#8230;] A Brief introduction to Buddhism (this post) Liberation and the Self  What the Buddha taught: The Four Truths  Sects and Texts: The Context of the Abhidhamma Reference lists are at the end of each chapter [&#8230;]
</p>
</div>]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>מאת: אסף פדרמן</title>
		<link>http://www.federman.org/blog/2006/32#comment-80</link>
		<pubDate>Fri, 25 Aug 2006 16:48:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.federman.org/blog/2006/32#comment-80</guid>
					<description>מה שיפה בפפטג'י זה שהוא גם צודק וגם מצחיק. 
אגב פרסומות, אצלי עכשיו זה מראה שואבי אבק של דייסון. 
?who wants to know</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div dir="rtl"><p>מה שיפה בפפטג&#8216;י זה שהוא גם צודק וגם מצחיק.<br />
אגב פרסומות, אצלי עכשיו זה מראה שואבי אבק של דייסון.<br />
?who wants to know
</p>
</div>]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
</channel>
</rss>
